Jump to...⌃
What is Somatic Experiencing?
Somatic Experiencing is a particular body-oriented approach developed by Peter Levine. Its model pays attention to how people experience responses to threat and stress, including physical sensations, rather than relying only on describing what happened. Somatic Experiencing International's introduction explains the approach from the organisation's perspective.
The word somatic means relating to the body, but the names are not interchangeable. Many therapists include bodily awareness in their work without offering this particular method. Somatic Experiencing has its own framework and professional training; the wider field includes different approaches and influences.
You may also encounter the phrase somatic experiential therapy. Descriptions can vary, so it is useful to ask what someone actually offers rather than relying on a similar-sounding name. A clear explanation should help you understand both the approach and the person's professional background.
How does Somatic Experiencing work?
Two ideas associated with the approach are titration and pendulation. Titration means approaching difficult activation in small, manageable amounts. Pendulation describes movement between activation and settling. The organisation's glossary of Somatic Experiencing terms sets out this vocabulary. These are concepts within the model, not instructions to make yourself feel a particular way.
In a therapeutic conversation, that emphasis on pacing can mean making room for pauses and checking what is manageable. Noticing a response does not mean having to intensify it or follow it all the way into a painful memory. You can say that an invitation does not feel useful.
It is reasonable to ask a therapist how they decide when to slow down, how you can signal discomfort and what happens if you want to change direction. Understanding those practical boundaries may be more helpful at the outset than learning every technical term.
Somatic Experiencing and trauma
Somatic Experiencing approaches trauma through attention to present bodily experience and protective responses. That is a therapeutic framework for exploring distress, not proof that a traumatic memory is literally stored in a particular muscle or that a physical release is needed to recover.
Physical sensations do not, by themselves, tell you what caused them. Tension, discomfort or a change in breathing should not be treated as evidence of a forgotten event. A therapist should leave room for uncertainty rather than supply a story about your past from what your body seems to be doing.
Research includes a randomised study of a defined Somatic Experiencing programme for PTSD. A study of a particular programme cannot establish what any one person's therapy will achieve, and it should not be used to promise an outcome from integrative sessions.
For a broader account of body-aware work after difficult experiences, read a gentle approach to trauma and somatic therapy. That article discusses the wider way of working rather than a single named method.
What might Somatic Experiencing therapy involve?
Somatic Experiencing therapy is often described through attention to sensation and pacing. What a particular appointment involves should be explained by the professional offering it. An integrative session influenced by the approach is not automatically the same as a formal Somatic Experiencing programme.
A body-aware conversation might begin with something you want to understand: becoming tense during conflict, finding it difficult to say no, or not knowing what you feel. Alongside talking, a therapist might invite you to notice what is happening now. You could choose to describe a sensation, stay with the conversation or pause.
You do not need to arrive with a detailed account of every difficult experience. It is equally reasonable to want to talk and to find some invitations to notice the body unhelpful. Those preferences belong in the conversation about how to work together.
Before beginning, ask how sessions are structured, what is optional and how progress will be reviewed. There should be space to discuss whether the work remains useful instead of feeling committed to a technique simply because you first enquired about it.
Somatic Experiencing and the body
Paying attention to the body does not have to mean concentrating inward for a long time. An invitation might be as brief as noticing the support of a chair or recognising that your shoulders have tightened while you speak. It is a way to include your immediate experience, not a test of how accurately you can describe it.
Some people find bodily attention unfamiliar or uncomfortable. Others notice very little, or worry that they are getting it wrong. None of those experiences needs to become a task to overcome in the first session. You can discuss what feels accessible and what you would rather leave alone.
This page is not a set of exercises to push through distress on your own. If something feels too much, it is appropriate to stop and discuss what you need. The existing guide to emotional overwhelm and regulation offers a broader introduction to understanding overwhelm without treating constant calm as the goal.
Who might explore Somatic Experiencing?
You might be curious about this approach because talking has helped you understand an experience, while some reactions remain difficult to put into words. You may simply want to know whether including bodily awareness would suit you. Curiosity is a starting point for a conversation, not evidence that you need a particular therapy.
There is no checklist here that can establish whether the method is right for you. Your circumstances, preferences, current support and the professional's scope of practice all matter. Bodily symptoms may also need medical assessment; reading about an approach cannot determine their cause or replace appropriate healthcare.
If you are looking for a Somatic Experiencing therapist or Somatic Experiencing practitioner, ask about their underlying profession, relevant training and how they describe their work. The organisation's professional training information describes a specific practitioner pathway. Being influenced by the model is different from holding that credential.
Michael's integrative approach
Michael is an integrative therapist influenced by Somatic Experiencing. He is trained in somatic trauma therapy. His approach brings attention to the body into a wider therapeutic relationship, alongside thoughts, feelings and the patterns that can emerge between people.
These descriptions are not a claim to Somatic Experiencing certification or an official practitioner title. They explain one influence within Michael's work. If a particular qualification or a formal programme matters to you, it is appropriate to ask directly about it before deciding whether to arrange sessions.
In integrative work, the starting point is the person rather than a requirement to follow a named method. There can be room to talk, reflect and notice bodily responses, with the pace discussed together. You can bring questions about what feels helpful, what is uncomfortable and what you would prefer to approach differently.
Michael's Somatic Therapy service explains the broader service, what sessions may involve and how to enquire. This article is an introduction to a specific influence; it does not replace that service page or describe all body-aware therapy as Somatic Experiencing.
Somatic Experiencing in London
If you are exploring Somatic Experiencing in London, it helps to distinguish between finding a formally trained practitioner in the method and choosing an integrative therapist whose work is influenced by it. If you are looking for a Somatic Experiencing therapist in London, ask about their specific training as well as whether their way of working suits you.
Michael offers in-person therapy at Angel, King's Cross and Farringdon, with online sessions also available. His Somatic Therapy in London page explains the existing London service. These locations are places to meet for his integrative work, not separate Somatic Experiencing clinics.
When looking for a Somatic Experiencing practitioner near you, practical details matter too: whether the journey feels workable, whether you want in-person or online sessions, and whether the therapist can explain their approach clearly. A nearby appointment is only one part of deciding whether the support suits your needs.
Finding out whether this approach is right for you
You do not need to choose a method before asking for help. It is fine to say that something about this approach interests you while you are unsure what you want from therapy. You can also be clear that you prefer talking, are cautious about bodily attention or want to understand the options first.
A useful initial conversation can cover your hopes, the therapist's way of working and any limits or questions you have. You might ask how body-aware work fits with talking, what happens if you become uncomfortable, and whether another kind of support would be more appropriate.
If you would like to explore Michael's integrative approach, you can arrange an initial call. It is an opportunity to ask questions and consider whether working together feels suitable, without needing a diagnosis or a fully formed explanation of what has been happening.
